Balling like a fool

Thanks, I appreciate the sarcasm, spherical bastard!

Utter as much "l.o.l" as you may see fit, it's nevertheless quite clear - and to my own delight - the immense struggle that you're currently undergoing: begrudgingly distorting reality. Either you're so ethically chained to liberalism, or you are plainly just stupid. Truth is that you could have easily taken a much more sophisticated (smart) methodology when engaging into an argument with someone who - well noticeably - graduated with a gifted debate class. Arguing is far more a matter of acquired than innate skills; you rely too much on your insignificant instincts that got you here in the first place. One who surely has the nerve to question another individual's grammar must do so within the degree of good grammar; sadly and evidently, this was not the case. Thou simply cannot withstand the fact that I'm (say) superior to thee in every fundamental aspect - and one certainly cannot gainsay the facts. In any case - and in less formal contexts - you ought to had taken a more friendly approach (again!), thereafter I will have been delighted to debate our political differences, not stupid grammar, which, by the way, you visibly lack. Nonetheless, there are undeniably occasions when having a respectful argument unconsciously thwarts me from criticizing my opponent's grammar (or shaky voice when confronted physically).

And just to make sure @Whewt doesn't get depress for ignoring (well) the outstanding used of the thesaurus. Tell me: Is it he who is simply, morally responding back as an act of courtesy, he who starts spamming? Or is it he who initiates (watered) the roots of an argument (plant) and further strengthen (lights) the argument (plant), the one who spam? Quite frankly and needless to say, this imbroglio is utterly unnecessary. It was not, most importantly, (and well noted above) brought to as my desired; indeed, it was augmented by a futile, lifeless organism and his relentless desire to emulate. So, "Here I stand; [for] I cannot do otherwise..." (Martin Luther).

i thought you were black haired
you are much cuter >.<

well, i thought you were different

u really are different from how i imagined you

You sure do wake up early bro

Wakka wakka wakka wakka
MAHNA MAHNA

I see the zit on everyones ass, is still spamming up your page with bullshit..

His rants are hilarous, this kid contributes nothing to society, not to mention speaks on behalf of anything ethical, as if it were not good enough for him. I almost felt the need, to debunk his half ass attempt at imforming us of the real Obama essay the other day. Until I actually read it in length, which was overflowing with racial discrimination, and ignorance.

None of which touched on actual issues other than taxes, which is no surpise. The kid is campaining for McCain, the philosphy of paying off our national debt is a joke to this jackass..

He dwelled on Ayres, and Acorn for the first ramble of lines. Which is a tactic of a child in panic, and is obviously frowned apon, and was discussed in length with Obama himself..
Not only is McCain losing votes, but has people such as Colin Powell speaking out apon this matter, and endorsing Obama.
A Bush advisor publicly endorsing a democrat, good times..

Anyways ramble ramble, I just saw it, and felt the need to post. The kid is pathetic, its not worth your time in my opinion.

Ha ha! Oh, I see: You get your grammar from Wikipedia. What a joke. Hasn't anybody tell you Wikipedia isn't reliable? And you did took Twain's words quite literally.

I do,however, give you credit at my technical writing error: "Mark Twain words" and "considere" with its extra "e". Technical error such as these are normal, it is not normal when it is repeated twice in the same sentence, for example, "degregation" isn't a word nor is it quoted rightfully. Apparently you cannot even begin to understand the concept of quoting!

In most cases, to show emphasis writers tend to italicized their work rather than capitalized them. Moreover, if you were, as a matter of fact, really showing emphasis then all letters within the given term should be capitalized; that is, ";IF" might be consider correct but ";If" is not - there's no justification but fact that at the last moment you edited your work.

It sicken me reading you correct my grammar when you write this, "I'm not attempting to 'overcome' you're bad grammar, that was just another word thats applicability you were unsure of." This is disgusting! "you're bad grammar"! Or perhaps you meant your bad grammar, and instead of "thats" how about just that? You couldn't possibly intended to write that's, right?

Likewise, "rockstar" is not a word. You either meant a star made of rock or a rock-star a slant term for crazy people who get up on stage and pretend to sing music, while others with equal retarded perspectives start yelling at each others in an effort become "alive". Not surprisingly one delusively accounts himself with "life".

Moving on, I couldn't help but to noticed the misused of comma in this statement, "The semicolon WAS used correctly, and the following word was 'IS' capitalized just as 'WAS' was in this sentence, for emphasis." As we all know commas are used to separate independent/dependent clauses provided the right conjunction. "The semicolon WAS used correctly," that's an independent clause right there. But, "the following word was 'IS' capitalized just as 'WAS' was in this sentence, for emphasis," is not a complete sentence! And therefore no comma is necessary.

"The phrase 'exposing myself to degregation' is a misuse of either 'exposing,' or 'degregation,' or possibly both," this, right here, is nonsense talk to its purist.

"In the sentence, 'As of now you're, indeed, a joke to society' the comma should have been placed after the word "as" and none of the other commas were appropriate," or were they? Haven't you heard of transitional terms and their proper use? As of now you're ___ a joke to society, is thwarted by the transitional term "indeed" within an independent clause which, indeed, requires the use of commas, both at the beginning and at the end of the word.

Congratulation on your "30 hours a week" school time, I realized this is a personal accomplishment but, needless to say, I'm not interest in your personal life and appearently you need more than "30 hours a week" of school.

Funny! You claimed you're beyond my limits, yet in an attempt to prove what's not you found yourself using improperly a semicolon followed by a capitalized termed. Furthermore, the obnoxious misused of the term "english" is truly nauseating, the "e" is always capitalized. Again, your attempts to overcome and oversight my grammar are nothing but signs of frustation and the lack of life. Unless you can prove the misapplication of the use of commas and m-dashes - correctly written: m-dash not "mdash" - just as I specifically humiliated you in your grammar, then I might considere listening to you. As of now you're, indeed, a joke to society, trying to prove what's not in attempt to emulate ultimately exposing yourself to degradation. Perhaps you shall find help in Mark Twain words, "First get the facts, then you can distort them at your leisure."

Fo sho'!
I thought it looked pretty good as well.