This thread was closed after I replied to it. I was going to double post, with an equally long and pompous statement about McCain's suck rating.
[ QUOTE=Sasuke Uchiha; as corrected by Balling like a fool]Greeting my fellow homosapiens. I rise here today as a citizen of Earth, with a distinguished incapacity for racist views or any sort of sexist ideology, for I too, am a human with a mother and a sister. Obama isn't fit, and far less ready, to be president. His relationship with radicals shouldn't be tolerated, we shouldn't elect someone that personally impacted this financial crisis, and we definitely should not tolerate Obama's tax proposal. People, the rise of Obama to the executive branch -- which, in fact, was founded in article two, not one, of the constitution -- is congruent to the likely outcome of a depression.
Obama's friends are well know radicals. Reverend Wright, perhaps the most cynical and racist religious leaders out there today, was, not surprisingly, endorsed by Obama for 20 years. In a press interview not so long ago, Obama publicly addressed his gratitude to this radical, and conveyed his emotions even further, with a story of the Baptism of his children, as performed by this radical. As time ravaged on, and the election approached, Obama's conscience was penetrated, and he ultimately rejected the Reverend (just a few months after making an announcement to the world in regard to Reverend Wright's unparalleled characteristics). Bill Ayer, a domestic terrorist during the 1960's, convicted for targeting the Pentagon and the Capitol, found a supportive mate in Borack Obama during their careers as community organizers from 1995-1999. Whether or not Obama launched his political career in the guy's living room is arguable, but what's indisputable, and undeniable, is the fact that they supported each other's views. Obama has even delivered speeches publicly with this same man that on September 11, 2001, announced to the world that he did not regret bombing the Pentagon but, does indeed regret not doing sufficient damage. While having relations with these radicals, Obama makes accusations that our troops are "air raiding villages and killing innocent civilians." Our troops who sacrifice their lives at the cost of our freedom!
The antagonistic behavior of ACORN and the greedy response of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac deteriorated our economy. As a young attorney, Obama represented ACORN. He among other members came up with this new strategy that would force mortgages lenders -- Fannie and Freddie -- to lend money to low income neighborhoods that would never be capable of paying it back. Essentially, this lead to foreclosers, to the downfall of Fannie and Freddie, and ultimately to recession. Republicans in their efforts to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were two times thwarted by democrats, people like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Tott Schumer: mainly in charge to properly overseeing these two companies and alerting the public and government before, not after, things like this arise. Barney Frank opposed any regulation at all up until '07-'08, when the companies had already lost 80%. Now, Chris Dodd is actually known for taking money and profiting from this whole mess. These people must be brought to justice and prosecuted by law, but with Barack Obama voting along with his party 94% of the time, having contributed in this mess, and with absolutely no record of reaching bipartisan consensus, he is not fit to lead.
Obama's proposal to increase federal taxes, namely income taxes, estate taxes, social security taxes, and capital gains, would devestate and ruin this nation. His ambitions to raise capital gain taxes from the current 15%, to 28%, would destroy the stock market and real estate industry. Who would be looking foward to holding onto their stock/real estate until after Obama gets elected, knowing that they can pay only 15% of the profit they make from selling their stock/real estate now to the goverment, vs. the 28% proposal of Obama? Obama's proposal of atax brake to 95% of Americans, is a paradox, for he clearly supports taxing small businesses. Increasing taxes on small businesses, small businesses constituting 85% of all businesses, would return that 95% tax brake to the goverment. Yet it is "patriotic" by Biden's philosophy, to pay higher taxes, similarly, "unpatriotic" to recieve what you work hard for. These characteristics of Barack Obama and his running mate are natural, having once voted for the biggest tax increase in history.
Do we really want a president that has/had relationships with radicals that don't favor the US? Do we really want a president that contributed to the cause of, and did nothing to fix, this financial crisis? Do we really want to be taxed to death? Fellas, it's not a matter of "where you stand depends on where you sit," it's a matter of what principles you value. If I somehow offended you, never forget Eleanor Roosevelt's words, "No on can hurt you without your consent," but, nevertheless, we shouldn't be subject to ignorance either - the fundemental principal of misery.[/QUOTE ]
So, I suppose that anyone who even began reading what I just quoted, would know that it isn't jibberish. That's because I fixed it.
I went through this entire post, and I edited out all of the grammar mistakes, --specifically the incorrect usage of the mdash-- reworded sentences so as not to have incomplete thoughts (first grade english), and omitted several of the multi-syllabic words, as the author of the post clearly didn't know what they meant when he used them.